[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160311220009.GC11274@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:00:09 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/android: change IOCTLs opcode after ABI change
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 07:42:43PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
>
> Burn the old opcode to avoid any potential old userspace running the old
> API to get weird errors. Changing the opcodes will make them fail right
> away.
>
> This is just a precaution, there no upstream users of these interfaces
> yet and the only user is Android, but we don't expect anyone trying to
> run android userspace and all it dependencies on top of upstream kernels.
>
> Moreover Android should be converted to use upstream sync_files.
>
> Suggested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/staging/android/uapi/sync.h | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Where does this belong in this patch series? Before it? After it? In
the middle?
Please resend the whole series, gather up all of the reviewed and
signed-off-by markings from everyone involved, and I'll be glad to apply
them.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists