[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E34197.8080209@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:07:19 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/FPU: Fix FPU handling on legacy FPU machines
On 03/11/2016 02:03 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> I'm still wondering, though, why didn't the Quark people scream
> earlier... And who knows, it was probably b0rked even before the
> FPU rewrite.
I've actually got 4.0 running on my Quark board. The FPU rewrite
dropped in just after that iirc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists