linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 0/6] Intel memory b/w monitoring support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1603111519350.1432@vshiva-Udesk>
Date:	Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:22:07 -0800 (PST)
From:	Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc:	Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
	vikas.shivappa@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...nel.org, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
	fenghua.yu@...el.com, h.peter.anvin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/6] Intel memory b/w monitoring support



On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 03:32:06PM -0800, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
>> The patch series has two preparatory patch for cqm and then 4 MBM
>> patches. Patches are based on tip perf/core.
>
> They were not (or at least not a recent copy of it); all the files got
> moved about by someone..

Right, I mentioned based on perf/core because Thomas had a patch for 
topology_max_packages(which went to tip) on which these mbm are dependent - I 
tested although by applying 
the topology patch seperately on rc7 .. the perf/core for some reason did not 
have a lot of files including perf_event_intel_cqm.c

>
> But a little sed quickly fixed that.
>
> I also fixed a bunch of little things while applying and added a little
> cleanup patch at the end.
>
> Please see if the branch below works for you:
>
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git perf/core
>
You mean I test the mbm patches on top of this ?

Thanks,
Vikas