[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E4577C.1030107@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:53:00 +0100
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/32: simplify pushes of zeroed pt_regs->REGs
On 03/12/2016 04:38 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Use of a temporary R8 register here seems to be unnecessary.
>>
>> "push %r8" is a two-byte insn (it needs REX prefix to specify R8),
>> "push $0" is two-byte too. It seems just using the latter would be
>> no worse.
>>
>> Thus, code had an unnecessary "xorq %r8,%r8" insn.
>
> Neat!
>
>> It probably costs nothing in execution time here since we are probably
>> limited by store bandwidth at this point, but still.
>>
>> Run-tested under QEMU: 32-bit calls still work:
>>
>> / # ./test_syscall_vdso32
>
> Did you manage to test all 3 compat variants:
>
>> @@ -72,24 +72,23 @@ ENTRY(entry_SYSENTER_compat)
>> @@ -205,17 +204,16 @@ ENTRY(entry_SYSCALL_compat)
>> @@ -316,11 +314,10 @@ ENTRY(entry_INT80_compat)
Yes.
test_syscall_vdso32 checks vdso syscall (if available)
and direct int80 syscall.
Booting two times, with different qemu flags:
qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu Opteron_G4
qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu SandyBridge
makes kernel choose either SYSCALL or SYSENTER vdso.
So it's all covered.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists