linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: EXYNOS: SROM driver for v4.6, 2nd try

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160313011604.GL17502@localhost>
Date:	Sat, 12 Mar 2016 17:16:04 -0800
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, arm@...nel.org,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: EXYNOS: SROM driver for v4.6, 2nd try

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:11:32PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 03 March 2016 09:04:54 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 01.03.2016 18:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > After Olof comments, second pull request with movement of SROM code
> > > to separate driver - under drivers/memory/samsung (more are planned for
> > > that directory).
> > > 
> > > This depends on (included here):
> > > 1. tag samsung-dt-srom-4.6: SROM-DT changes, merged already to arm-soc,
> > > 2. tag samsung-soc-4.6-2: next/soc changes, sent few days ago, not merged yet.
> > > 
> > > This may conflict in the future (in linux-next or Linus) around
> > > drivers/memory/Kconfig with iommu tree. Just add all the changes.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The diff at the end contains both samsung-soc-4.6-2 and this stuff.
> > > To make finding changes easier, below you will find difference between
> > > this tag and samsung-soc-4.6-2:
> > 
> > I see you did not pull this yet so can you wait a little bit? Rob
> > Herring posted some comments on bindings so this might be revisited...
> > 
> > This is an unlucky patchset...
> 
> It was a bit late last night, and I didn't want to check that the
> dependencies were correct. I also saw that you had discussed these
> contents with Olof before, but didn't follow the thread there, so
> I was hoping that Olof could get back to it and check that his
> concerns are all addressed before picking it up.

Hi,

I've merged the other SoC branches now (that were respun without this SROM
contents). I think it's safe given the feedback from Rob to wait with this
driver for the next cycle. That way the dependencies are gone too since they
will have been merged.


-Olof