[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E68019.4010007@xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:10:50 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: tiffany lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, PoChun.Lin@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH v5 0/8] Add MT8173 Video Encoder Driver and VPU Driver
On 03/14/2016 10:04 AM, tiffany lin wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 08:21 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 03/14/2016 08:12 AM, tiffany lin wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> After change to use "v4l-utils.git master branch", "V4l2-compliance
>>> -d /dev/video1" fail on "fail: v4l2-test-buffers.cpp(555):
>>> check_0(crbufs.reserved, sizeof(crbufs.reserved))".
>>>
>>> Check the source code and found
>>>
>>> memset(&crbufs, 0xff, sizeof(crbufs)); -> crbufs to 0xff
>>> node->g_fmt(crbufs.format, i);
>>> crbufs.count = 0;
>>> crbufs.memory = m;
>>> fail_on_test(doioctl(node, VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS, &crbufs));
>>> fail_on_test(check_0(crbufs.reserved, sizeof(crbufs.reserved)));
>>> fail_on_test(crbufs.index != q.g_buffers());
>>>
>>> crbufs is initialized to fill with 0xff and after VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS,
>>> crbufs.reserved field should be 0x0. But v4l2_m2m_create_bufs and
>>> vb2_create_bufs do not process reserved filed.
>>> Do we really need to check reserved filed filled with 0x0? Or we need to
>>> change vb2_create_bufs to fix this issue?
>>
>> The reserved field is zeroed in v4l_create_bufs() in v4l2-ioctl.c, so even before
>> vb2_create_bufs et al is called.
>>
>> The fact that it is no longer zeroed afterwards suggests that someone is messing
>> with the reserved field.
>>
>> You'll have to do a bit more digging, I'm afraid.
>>
> Hi Hans,
>
> Thanks for your information.
> I found the root cause is in "put_v4l2_create32".
> It do not copy reserved field from kernel space to user space.
> After modification,"test VIDIOC_REQBUFS/CREATE_BUFS/QUERYBUF: OK"
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> index f38c076..109f687 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> @@ -280,7 +280,8 @@ static int put_v4l2_format32(struct v4l2_format *kp,
> struct v4l2_format32 __user
> static int put_v4l2_create32(struct v4l2_create_buffers *kp, struct
> v4l2_create_buffers32 __user *up)
> {
> if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, up, sizeof(struct
> v4l2_create_buffers32)) ||
> - copy_to_user(up, kp, offsetof(struct v4l2_create_buffers32,
> format)))
> + copy_to_user(up, kp, offsetof(struct v4l2_create_buffers32,
> format)) ||
> + copy_to_user(up->reserved, kp->reserved,
> sizeof(kp->reserved)))
> return -EFAULT;
> return __put_v4l2_format32(&kp->format, &up->format);
> }
Yup, that's the cause. Can you post this as a 'proper' patch to the mailinglist?
I'll take it for kernel 4.6 (and I'll add a CC to the stable mailinglist to
get it backported as well).
Thanks!
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists