[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1457954789-4885-2-git-send-email-martink@posteo.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:26:29 +0100
From: Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>
To: jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de,
pmeerw@...erw.net
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] iio: mma8452: use runtime pm instead of device specific autosleep
What is this autosleep?
-----------------------
It slows down the device after x seconds of inactivity. The thing is, we have
really achieved almost the same by runtime pm.
differnces are:
autosleep
* uses more power during inactivity
* the first read after inactivity slightly faster
* complicated to understand for the user
* no documented sysfs interface (afaik)
* complicated to read and maintain
runtime pm
* already merged in mma8452
* uses less power during inactivity
* first read after inactivity slower
* easy to use. well documented.
* easy to maintain and understand
The two approaches solve the same problem. runtime pm has more advantages
than autosleep and comes quite close to it's behaviour anyways. As I see it,
autosleep, even if somehow supported, would never be used anyways.
So resolve this issue by "ignoring" autosleep.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>
Reviewed-by: Martina Kepplinger <martina.novakovic@...o.com>
---
drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
index d0eeba0..375e45f 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
*
* 7-bit I2C slave address 0x1c/0x1d (pin selectable)
*
- * TODO: orientation events, autosleep
+ * TODO: orientation events
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists