linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] mmc: sdhci-pci: Do not set DMA mask in enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56E6B5F4.6090602@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:00:36 +0200
From:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] mmc: sdhci-pci: Do not set DMA mask in
 enable_dma()

On 14/03/16 05:15, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>> On 07/03/16 04:07, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>> DMA mask will already be set by sdhci_set_dma_mask(), which
>>> is equivalent to the removed code since pci_set_dma_mask()
>>> expands to its DMA-API counterpart.
>>>
>>> There should also be no reason to set the DMA mask after probe.
>>
>> Let's run that by the PCI mailing list just to be sure.  The patches for
>> reference:
>>
>>         http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=145731654328126&w=2
>>         http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=145731654328128&w=2
>>
>> change the sdhci-pci driver to set the DMA mask once during probe instead of
>> every time during resume.  Is there any reason a PCI device driver might
>> need to set the DMA mask every time during resume?
> 
> Not seeing much reaction for this patchset. PCI being the only
> possible point of contention, can we maybe roll it into -next and see
> what happens?

+Rafael

Rafael, can you offer any thoughts on this:

PCI drivers that want to use DMA might call pci_set_master() in the pm
resume callback.  Some drivers (like sdhci-pci) also, presumably out of
convenience, set the DMA mask at the same time.  The question is: is it OK
instead to set the DMA mask just once during probe, or is there some other
reason the DMA mask needs to be set every time during resume?