linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [patch 1/4] hotplug: Prevent alloc/free of irq descriptors during cpu up/down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56E6B8BF.3020603@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:12:31 -0400
From:	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	xiao jin <jin.xiao@...el.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [patch 1/4] hotplug: Prevent alloc/free of irq
 descriptors during cpu up/down

On 03/12/2016 04:19 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Boris,
>
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 07/14/2015 04:15 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>>> The issue here is that all architectures need that protection and just
>>>>> Xen does irq allocations in cpu_up.
>>>>>
>>>>> So moving that protection into architecture code is not really an
>>>>> option.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Otherwise we will need to have something like arch_post_cpu_up()
>>>>>>>> after the lock is released.
>>>>> I'm not sure, that this will work. You probably want to do this in the
>>>>> cpu prepare stage, i.e. before calling __cpu_up().
>>>> For PV guests (the ones that use xen_cpu_up()) it will work either before
>>>> or
>>>> after __cpu_up(). At least my (somewhat limited) testing didn't show any
>>>> problems so far.
>>>>
>>>> However, HVM CPUs use xen_hvm_cpu_up() and if you read comments there you
>>>> will
>>>> see that xen_smp_intr_init() needs to be called before native_cpu_up() but
>>>> xen_init_lock_cpu() (which eventually calls irq_alloc_descs()) needs to be
>>>> called after.
>>>>
>>>> I think I can split xen_init_lock_cpu() so that the part that needs to be
>>>> called after will avoid going into irq core code. And then the rest will
>>>> go
>>>> into arch_cpu_prepare().
>>> I think we should revisit this for 4.3. For 4.2 we can do the trivial
>>> variant and move the locking in native_cpu_up() and x86 only. x86 was
>>> the only arch on which such wreckage has been seen in the wild, but we
>>> should have that protection for all archs in the long run.
>>>
>>> Patch below should fix the issue.
>> Thanks! Most of my tests passed, I had a couple of failures but I will need to
>> see whether they are related to this patch.
> Did you ever come around to address that irq allocation from within cpu_up()?
>
> I really want to generalize the protection instead of carrying that x86 only
> hack forever.

Sorry, I completely forgot about this. Let me see how I can take 
allocations from under the lock. I might just be able to put them in CPU 
notifiers --- most into CPU_UP_PREPARE but spinlock interrupt may need 
to go into CPU_ONLINE.

-boris