linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Firmware: broadcom sprom: clarifiy SSB dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACna6rzds0_+qxzp_MkFyiJijMyODK6VkxWvXuiEBKYHj-dwEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:06 +0100
From:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
	"linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Firmware: broadcom sprom: clarifiy SSB dependency

On 14 March 2016 at 16:34, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Monday 14 March 2016 15:37:18 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 14 March 2016 at 15:21, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> > The broadcom firmware drvier calls into the ssb SPROM code if that
>> > is enabled, but it fails if the SSB code is in a loadable module
>> > because the bcm47xx firmware is always built-in:
>> >
>> > drivers/firmware/built-in.o: In function `bcm47xx_sprom_register_fallbacks':
>> > bcm47xx_sprom.c:(.text+0x11c4): undefined reference to `ssb_arch_register_fallback_sprom'
>> >
>> > This adds a Kconfig dependency to ensure that we cannot turn on the
>> > generic sprom support if the ssb sprom is in a module.
>>
>> Can you attach your config that triggered this build error? I modified
>> condition to the:
>> #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_SSB) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SSB_SPROM)
>> which I believe should be enough.
>
> From inspection, I think your solution is sufficient to avoid the error.
> I found the bug while travelling and I'm only now catching up on the submissions,
> so I must have missed the fact that it was fixed. I looked at the code
> to see if additional patches had been applied on top, but I did not
> realize that you had modified the driver in place.

I sent a separated patch for this:
https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/12836/
and it was folded/squashed by Ralf.

-- 
Rafał