[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E6E753.1020505@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:31:15 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, mpa@...gutronix.de, treding@...dia.com,
bparrot@...com, acourbot@...dia.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] gpio: DT: Rephrase "gpios" of hog node to support
multiple gpios
On 03/11/2016 06:43 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> The property "gpios" of GPIO hog node support the multiple GPIO entries.
> Rephrase the details of this property for this new support.
>
> Add details of new property "label" for GPIO label name.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> Optional properties:
> - line-name: The GPIO label name. If not present the node name is used.
> +- label: The GPIO lable name. This can have multiple string for GPIO
> + label names to match with the GPIOs in "gpios" properties.
> + If line-name is prosent than name is taken from line-name. If
> + it is not then the name will be taken from label. If both are
> + not available then node name is used for GPIO label name.
Why are there two properties for the same thing? Why not just allow
line-name to have multiple entries instead of introducing a new property?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists