linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56E6EC27.2090700@arm.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:51:51 +0000
From:	James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14

Hi Guenter,

On 14/03/16 14:37, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> To give people an idea what to expect in the merge window, here are my current
> build and runtime test results. Some of the runtime failures are due to the
> newly introduced i2c bug, but many (including the arm64 boot failures) have
> been around for a while.

> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 96 pass: 69 fail: 27
> Failed tests:

> 	arm64:smp:defconfig

This may be due to this qemu bug: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/585237/


> 	arm64:nosmp:defconfig

Since 4b3dc9679cf7 ("arm64: force CONFIG_SMP=y and remove redundant #ifdefs"),
this may just be testing the smp case again - unless your qemu config is
different too.


> Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Thanks - this looks like a mine of information!


James