[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG53R5UTc8xF4TdRJm3ASv6PQ-JxhW7vDgXpFtYqX2tz_58UeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:50:25 +0530
From: Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>
To: oulijun <oulijun@...wei.com>
Cc: "Wei Hu(Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@...wei.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jiri@...lanox.com,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
gongyangming@...wei.com, xiaokun@...wei.com,
tangchaofei@...wei.com, haifeng.wei@...wei.com,
yisen.zhuang@...wei.com, yankejian@...wei.com,
lisheng011@...wei.com, charles.chenxin@...wei.com,
linuxarm@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] infiniband: hns: add Hisilicon RoCE support(driver code)
>>
>> Since SRQ is not supported in this driver version, can you keep
>> remaining code base also to not bother about SRQ specifically
>> poll_cq_one, modify_qp, destroy_qp etc?
>> SRQ support can come as complete additional patch along with cmd_mask,
>> callbacks and rest of the code.
>>
>> .
> Sorry, I see your review in time.
> Sure, SRQ is not supported in current roce driver. I have verified the function
> for RDMA. It is not influence. For your question, we need to analyse it scientific.
> after that, i will reply your doubt, is that ok?
Yes. No problem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists