linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access fails without !panic_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFy2dNgBJwjd+fRUYQf9OxqGkkcjUEarv+o3QSFTJ6+gJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:40:58 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	xen-devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access
 fails without !panic_on_oops

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> The code in my queue is, literally:
>
> bool ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
>                  struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
> {
>     WARN_ONCE(1, "unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x%x",
>           (unsigned int)regs->cx);
>
>     /* Pretend that the read succeeded and returned 0. */
>     regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
>     regs->ax = 0;
>     regs->dx = 0;
>     return true;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe);

I guess I can live with this, as long as we also extend the
early-fault handling to work with the special exception handlers.

And as long as people start understanding that killing the machine is
a bad bad bad thing. It's a debugging nightmare.

               Linus