linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: context_tracking: avoid irq_save/irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:23:17 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: context_tracking: avoid irq_save/irq_restore on
 kernel entry and exit

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>> x86 always calls user_enter and user_exit with interrupt disabled.
>> Therefore, it is not necessary to check for exceptions, nor to
>> save/restore the IRQ state, when context tracking functions are
>> called by guest_enter and guest_exit.
>>
>> Use the previously introduced __context_tracking_entry and
>> __context_tracking_exit.
>
> x86 isn't ready for this yet.  We could do a quick-and-dirty fix with
> explicit IRQs-on-and-off much protected by the static key, or we could
> just wait until I finish the syscall cleanup.  I favor the latter, but
> you're all welcome to do the former and I'll review it.
>

Once Linus pulls tip:x86/asm, x86 should be ready for this.  Want to try again?

--Andy