[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160314200110.GA11038@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 21:01:10 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ptrace: change __ptrace_unlink() to clear ->ptrace under
->siglock
This test-case (simplified version of generated by syzkaller)
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
void test(void)
{
for (;;) {
if (fork()) {
wait(NULL);
continue;
}
ptrace(PTRACE_SEIZE, getppid(), 0, 0);
ptrace(PTRACE_INTERRUPT, getppid(), 0, 0);
_exit(0);
}
}
int main(void)
{
int np;
for (np = 0; np < 8; ++np)
if (!fork())
test();
while (wait(NULL) > 0)
;
return 0;
}
triggers the 2nd WARN_ON_ONCE(!signr) warning in do_jobctl_trap(). The problem
is that __ptrace_unlink() clears task->jobctl under siglock but task->ptrace
is cleared without this lock held; this fools the "else" branch which assumes
that !PT_SEIZED means PT_PTRACED.
Note also that most of other PTRACE_SEIZE checks can race with detach from the
exiting tracer too. Say, the callers of ptrace_trap_notify() assume that SEIZED
can't go away after it was checked.
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/ptrace.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index 2341efe..32c5dd2 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -73,12 +73,11 @@ void __ptrace_unlink(struct task_struct *child)
{
BUG_ON(!child->ptrace);
- child->ptrace = 0;
child->parent = child->real_parent;
list_del_init(&child->ptrace_entry);
spin_lock(&child->sighand->siglock);
-
+ child->ptrace = 0;
/*
* Clear all pending traps and TRAPPING. TRAPPING should be
* cleared regardless of JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING. Do it explicitly.
--
2.5.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists