linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1457985791.11972.128.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:03:11 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 16:59 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> I don't think they make little sense now since even a non-native english
> speaker like me can understand it :)

That's a non sequitur if ever I read one.

> But yes, it's cryptic at the very least. That's the problem with long text
> and the 80 char limit to make checkpatch.pl happy. I guess I can just move
> the message a little bit even if that will make to not be properly aligned.

There's no issue with longer than 80 column lines
for these messages.  checkpatch wouldn't complain.