[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160314.161851.1859011194305606637.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:18:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ddaney@...iumnetworks.com
Cc: ddaney.cavm@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, f.fainelli@...il.com,
rric@...nel.org, sgoutham@...ium.com, galak@...eaurora.org,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, mark.rutland@....com,
pawel.moll@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rchintakuntla@...ium.com,
david.daney@...ium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] net/phy: Improvements to Cavium Thunder MDIO
code.
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:12:53 -0700
> At this point, I think the best path forward is for me to rebase
> against net-next and send you a small fixup set to what was merged.
>
> What do you think?
That is in fact the one and only option.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists