[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160314132922.b2297b2b486416e4980741ee@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:29:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, hughd@...gle.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kirill@...temov.name,
n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/9] mm/hugetlb: Make GENERAL_HUGETLB functions PGD
implementation aware
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:31:55 +0530 Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 03/09/2016 05:40 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > Currently both the ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB functions 'huge_pte_alloc'
> > and 'huge_pte_offset' dont take into account huge page implementation
> > at the PGD level. With addition of PGD awareness into these functions,
> > more architectures like POWER which also implements huge pages at PGD
> > level (along with PMD level), can use ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB option.
>
> Hugh/Mel/Naoya/Andrew,
>
> Thoughts/inputs/suggestions ? Does this change looks okay ?
Patches 1, 2 and 3 look OK to me. Please include them in the powerpc
merge when the patchset is considered ready.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists