linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160314205101.GD28277@piout.net>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 21:51:01 +0100
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

On 14/03/2016 at 13:33:08 -0700, Joe Perches wrote :
> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 21:19 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > checkpatch will not complain for messages but it will definitively
> > complain if they are not properly aligned:)
> 
> checkpatch wouldn't actually complain unless the --strict option
> was used or these files were in drivers/net or drivers/staging.
> 

yeah, I'm using --strict on all the patches I receive.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com