[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160314232731.0000404d@localhost>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:27:31 +0100
From: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: martin.petersen@...cle.com, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
James Smart <james.smart@...gotech.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...gotech.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] lpfc: fix misleading indentation
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc-6 complains about the indentation of the lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array()
> call in lpfc_online(), which clearly doesn't look right:
>
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function 'lpfc_online':
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2880:3: warning: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
> lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2863:2: note: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not
> if (vports != NULL)
> ^~
>
> Looking at the patch that introduced this code, it's clear that the
> behavior is correct and the indentation is wrong.
>
> This fixes the indentation and adds curly braces around the previous
> if() block for clarity, as that is most likely what caused the code
> to be misindented in the first place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Fixes: 549e55cd2a1b ("[SCSI] lpfc 8.2.2 : Fix locking around HBA's port_list")
> ---
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists