[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160314225017.GC19926@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:50:17 -0600
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Remove un-needed 'major' registration when
alloc_disk(0) is used.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 08:59:28AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> When alloc_disk(0) is used, the ->major number is ignored and
> irrelevant. Yet several drivers register a major number anyway.
>
> This series of patches removes the pointless registrations. The pmem
> driver also does this, but a patch has already been sent for that
> driver.
>
> Note that I am not in a position to test these beyond simple compile
> testing.
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
>
> ---
>
> NeilBrown (4):
> nvdimm/blk: don't allocate unused major device number
> nvdimm/btt: don't allocate unused major device number
> memstick: don't allocate unused major for ms_block
> NVMe: don't allocate unused nvme_major
>
>
> drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c | 17 ++---------------
> drivers/nvdimm/blk.c | 18 +-----------------
> drivers/nvdimm/btt.c | 19 ++-----------------
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 16 +---------------
> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
There are several other drivers that allocate a major, but then use it for
some small number of minors (1 for null_blk.c and 16 for virtio_blk.c). They
both have GENHD_FL_EXT_DEVT set, so I think what happens is that after we
exhaust the allocated minors they hop over to having BLOCK_EXT_MAJOR as a
major and a dynamically assigned minor.
It seems like these could easily be converted in the same way so they'd use
BLOCK_EXT_MAJOR for their major and have a bunch of dynamically assigned
minors.
Does this break something I'm not seeing?
Yay for this series, by the way. :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists