linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:58:11 +0100
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

On 14/03/2016 at 18:07:36 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote :
> Hello Joe,
> 
> On 03/14/2016 05:30 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:25 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> The clock and source clock looked up by the driver may not be available
> >> just because the clock controller driver was not probed yet so printing
> >> an error in this case is not correct and only adds confusion to users.
> >>
> >> However, knowing that a driver's probe was deferred may be useful so it
> >> can be printed as debug information.
> > 
> > Hello again Javier:
> >> +			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "probe deferred due missing rtc clk\n");
> > 
> > Again, intelligible English would not use "due"
> > but would use "due to" or "because of".
> > 
> 
> Ok, I'll post another version then. I hope the third time's the charm...
> 
> Alexandre, do you have any other comments before I re-spin this patch?
> 

No further comments :)


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com