[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E7B094.3000301@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:49:56 +0100
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
Sam Creasey <sammy@...my.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/22] ncr5380: Adopt uniform DMA setup convention
On 03/15/2016 04:19 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
>>> @@ -1555,8 +1555,7 @@ static int NCR5380_transfer_dma(struct S
>>> NCR5380_read(RESET_PARITY_INTERRUPT_REG);
>>> *data = d + c;
>>> *count = 0;
>>> - *phase = NCR5380_read(STATUS_REG) & PHASE_MASK;
>>> - return foo;
>>> + return result;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>
>> Don't you miss a phase update here?
>
> I guess I missed explaining the change in the commit log.
>
> The *phase assignment is redundant because after NCR5380_transfer_dma()
> returns control to NCR5380_information_transfer(), the latter routine then
> also returns, and so *phase is dead.
>
Right. Please add this to the commit message.
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@...e.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists