linux-kernel - [patch] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - using logical instead of bitwise AND

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160315071140.GF13560@mwanda>
Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:11:40 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>
Cc:	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...math.org>,
	Christopher Heiny <cheiny@...aptics.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - using logical instead of bitwise AND

There is a typo so we have && instead of &.

Fixes: ff8f83708b3e ('Input: synaptics-rmi4 - add support for 2D sensors and F11')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c
index 77a5eb8..ec8a10d 100644
--- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c
+++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c
@@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ static int rmi_f11_get_query_parameters(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev,
 	sensor_query->has_abs = !!(query_buf[0] & RMI_F11_HAS_ABS);
 	sensor_query->has_gestures = !!(query_buf[0] & RMI_F11_HAS_GESTURES);
 	sensor_query->has_sensitivity_adjust =
-		!!(query_buf[0] && RMI_F11_HAS_SENSITIVITY_ADJ);
+		!!(query_buf[0] & RMI_F11_HAS_SENSITIVITY_ADJ);
 	sensor_query->configurable = !!(query_buf[0] & RMI_F11_CONFIGURABLE);
 
 	sensor_query->nr_x_electrodes =
@@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ static int rmi_f11_get_query_parameters(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev,
 		sensor_query->has_bending_correction =
 			!!(query_buf[0] & RMI_F11_HAS_BENDING_CORRECTION);
 		sensor_query->has_large_object_suppression =
-		!!(query_buf[0] && RMI_F11_HAS_LARGE_OBJECT_SUPPRESSION);
+			!!(query_buf[0] & RMI_F11_HAS_LARGE_OBJECT_SUPPRESSION);
 		sensor_query->has_jitter_filter =
 			!!(query_buf[0] & RMI_F11_HAS_JITTER_FILTER);
 		query_size++;