[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160315105318.GU6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:53:18 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
joro@...tes.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
andihartmann@...enet.de, vw@...mu.org, labbott@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 02/10] perf/amd/iommu: Consolidate and move
perf_event_amd_iommu header
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:40:17AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:39:31AM +0700, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> > What if I just merge the newly introduced arch/x86/include/perf/amd/iommu.h
> > into the include/linux/amd-iommu.h? I do not see the point of having to
> > separate things out into two files.
>
> Except that this header has x86-specific stuff and include/linux/ is
> arch-agnostic.
Which would suggest that header is placed wrong, because I would expect
the amd-iommu to really be rather x86 specific. Or is AMD making ARM
parts for which this is useful too?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists