[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbsu+yfFvCR2=vKO3+S46+GHSy+3wu+5uwMmsu0_mfP-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:12:59 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Paweł Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] gpio: of: Return error if gpio hog configuration failed
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com> wrote:
> If GPIO hog configuration failed while adding OF based
> gpiochip() then return the error instead of ignoring it.
>
> This helps of properly handling the gpio driver dependency.
>
> When adding the gpio hog nodes for NVIDIA's Tegra210 platforms,
> the gpio_hogd() fails with EPROBE_DEFER because pinctrl is not
> ready at this time and gpio_request() for Tegra GPIO driver
> returns error. The error was not causing the Tegra GPIO driver
> to fail as the error was getting ignored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
> Cc: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Oops is this something I should apply for fixes and tag
for stable?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists