linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] watchdog: don't run proc_watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:28:58 -0400
From:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To:	Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, uobergfe@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: don't run proc_watchdog_update if new value is
 same as old

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:02:31PM -0500, Josh Hunt wrote:
> On 03/14/2016 11:29 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> >
> >Hi Josh,
> >
> >I believe Uli thought the below patch might fix it.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Don
> 
> Don
> 
> It looks like I was incorrect when I said 4.5 was getting the soft lockup. I
> originally found this problem on 4.1.19 and saw both the problem my patch
> solves and the soft lockups there. I thought when I checked 4.5 that I saw
> both issues there as well, but going back and checking now that is not the
> case. I only see the issue my patch resolves on 4.5.
> 
> With that info my changelog is incorrect now as it states I saw a soft
> lockup on the head. I will submit a v2 of my patch with the updated
> changelog. I'll also cc stable this time as I'd like to see this fix end up
> there as well.
> 
> As for the soft lockups showing up on 4.1, I tried Uli's patch and it did
> not help. After that I did a git bisect to figure out when the soft lockup
> was fixed and it appears to be resolved after one of the commits in this
> series:
> 
> commit 81a4beef91ba4a9e8ad6054ca9933dff7e25ff28
> Author: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>
> Date:   Fri Sep 4 15:45:15 2015 -0700
> 
>     watchdog: introduce watchdog_park_threads() and
> watchdog_unpark_threads()
> 
> I didn't identify the exact commit.
> 
> It would be nice to resolve the soft lockup for the stable folks since 4.1
> and 4.4 are longterm stable releases and would see this problem.
> 
> I did not have time to debug it any more outside of this bisection today. If
> you have something you'd like me to try which may work for the stable
> kernels I'm happy to test it.
> 
> For the record I'm able to reproduce the soft lockup on 4.1 doing:
> 
> while :; do echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog; sleep .1; done & sleep
> 30 && kill %1 && sleep 5


Thanks for the feedback Josh!  Good to know the softlockup was fixed
already. :-)

Cheers,
Don