[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160315145327.GD27081@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:53:27 -0500
From: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...com>
To: Kyle Roeschley <kyle.roeschley@...com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff.westfahl@...com,
nathan.sullivan@...com, xander.huff@...com, aaron.rossetto@...com,
gratian.crisan@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] misc: nirtfeatures: physical interface elements
Hey Kyle-
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 04:55:08PM -0500, Kyle Roeschley wrote:
> From: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@...com>
From what I understand, this was mostly Aaron's work, so he should get
authorship. I could be wrong, though, but you'll want to check.
> These changes add support for PIEs (physical interface elements), which
> are defined as physical elements fixed to a controller/chassis with
> which a user can interact (e.g. LEDs and switches) and whose meaning
> is user-defined and implementation-specific.
[..]
> ---
> drivers/misc/nirtfeatures.c | 753 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 694 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
This patchset is awkwardly split up, especially because you are removing
what you are adding in the first patch. I would suggest coming up with
a better patch breakdown that doesn't do this, to make it easier on
reviewers.
Perhaps, breaking it up into a patchset where each patch implements a
different class of functionality (leds, input).
Josh
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists