linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56E76C6F.5020803@osg.samsung.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:59:11 -0300
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

Hello Krzysztof,

On 03/14/2016 10:50 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 10:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The clock and source clock looked up by the driver may not be available
>> just because the clock controller driver was not probed yet so printing
>> an error in this case is not correct and only adds confusion to users.
>>
>> However, knowing that a driver's probe was deferred may be useful so it
>> can be printed as a debug information.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Change debug messages again as suggested by Joe Perches.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Improve debug messages as suggested by Joe Perches.
>>
>>  drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
>> index ffb860d18701..d01ad7e8078e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
>> @@ -501,18 +501,27 @@ static int s3c_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  
>>  	info->rtc_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "rtc");
>>  	if (IS_ERR(info->rtc_clk)) {
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to find rtc clock\n");
>> -		return PTR_ERR(info->rtc_clk);
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(info->rtc_clk);
>> +		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to find rtc clock\n");
>> +		else
>> +			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "probe deferred due to missing rtc clk\n");
>> +		return ret;
>>  	}
>>  	clk_prepare_enable(info->rtc_clk);
>>  
>>  	if (info->data->needs_src_clk) {
>>  		info->rtc_src_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "rtc_src");
>>  		if (IS_ERR(info->rtc_src_clk)) {
>> -			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> -				"failed to find rtc source clock\n");
>> +			ret = PTR_ERR(info->rtc_src_clk);
>> +			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +				dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> +					"failed to find rtc source clock\n");
>> +			else
>> +				dev_dbg(&pdev->dev,
>> +					"probe deferred due to missing rtc src clk\n");
>>  			clk_disable_unprepare(info->rtc_clk);
>> -			return PTR_ERR(info->rtc_src_clk);
>> +			return ret;
>>  		}
>>  		clk_prepare_enable(info->rtc_src_clk);
>>  	}
>>
> 
> The error path starts looking complicated. This has now 4 indentation
> levels...
> 

Yeah, I don't think we can get rid of the 4 indentation levels since
the function already has 3 and a check for the errno code is needed.

> I agree for removal of error in case of probe deferral because it might
> be misleading but I don't see much benefit of a debug message.
>

But yes, we can at least get rid of the else statement. I don't have a
strong opinion about the debug information, I left it to avoid someone
to tell me that I was removing a useful log.
 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America