linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160315153355.GS4287@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:33:55 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.6

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:06:06AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 03:12:19PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > (Note the somewhat larger .html/.htmlx files about RCU data structures - let us
> > > > know if you think they are over the top.)
> > > 
> > > I don't think they are over the top because they are *large*.
> > > 
> > > I don't want to pull them because they seem to be totally pointlessly
> > > *duplicate*,
> > > 
> > > I don't want to see the same stuff twice.
> > > 
> > > Either you do html, or you do htmlx. But in no case do you do *both*.
> > > 
> > > And quite franklty, since the only point of that seems to be the whole
> > > "quiz" thing, I erally think this should go away.
> > > 
> > > No more of these silly cute pictures, or cute html tricks with quizzes.
> > > 
> > > Do *documentation*, not games!
> > > 
> > > Not pulled.
> > 
> > OK, will rework.
> 
> Meanwhile, to not hold up the other RCU changes, I've reconstructed core/rcu with 
> the following branches:
> 
>     fixes.2015.02.23a: Miscellaneous fixes
>     torture.2015.02.23a: Torture-test updates
> 
> i.e. the doc.2015.02.23a bits that need reworking are left out.
> 
> I'll send an updated pull request in a few minutes.

Good point!  I will send a pull of the documentation commits that do not
involve Documentation/RCU/Design.

							Thanx, Paul