[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160315163956.GQ23621@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:39:56 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>, x86@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fix suspicious RCU usage in msr tracing.
> Back in January, Andi suggested swapping the order in which
> we ack the APIC irq, so it too is protected by rcu.
> There was no follow-up, and it seems to work for me.
>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
-Andi
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> index c80f6b6f3da2..e8c4fba52d3d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> @@ -644,8 +644,8 @@ static inline void entering_irq(void)
>
> static inline void entering_ack_irq(void)
> {
> - ack_APIC_irq();
> entering_irq();
> + ack_APIC_irq();
> }
>
> static inline void ipi_entering_ack_irq(void)
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
Powered by blists - more mailing lists