[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E842EE.7030301@lechnology.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:14:22 -0500
From: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>, nsekhar@...com
Cc: ulf.hansson@...aro.org, khilman@...nel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mmc: davinci: don't use dma platform resources
On 03/15/2016 03:54 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 03/15/16 00:54, David Lechner wrote:
>>
>> host->dma_tx =
>> - dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask, edma_filter_fn,
>> - &host->txdma, mmc_dev(host->mmc), "tx");
>> + dma_request_slave_channel(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "tx");
>
> you would need to use dma_request_chan() to be able to rely on the legacy
> channel mapping.
> I have staged commits for converting all daVinci and OMAP drivers, I'll attach
> the patch I have for davinci-mmc for reference.
> When we convert to use the dma_request_chan() we can handle deferred probing
> also...
>
OK. So I should redo this patch on top of the patch you attached?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists