[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFw6W9aCOeBMnTSFvU6YgCDaSjVMuyCQv5RbHN7tANDuLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:36:21 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nohz: Change tick_dep_mask from 'unsigned long' to
'unsigned int'
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Frederic Weisbecker
<fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> And wouldn't it be so nice if "thread_info->flags" would just be
>> atomic_t too. Right now we use a mixture of bit-ops and ACCESS_ONCE()
>> (and many codepaths then doing neither, and just accessing it
>> directly, ignoring any races.
>>
>> Oh well.
>
> I can try that too while at it :-)
The real problem with thread_info->flags is that it's
per-architecture, and people access that thing from assembly code.
So changing that is potentially really *very* painful. The patch
itself is not likely too bad, but having confidence that everything
was caught?
Nasty. It would probably be a very good cleanup, but I'm not sure how
worthwhile it is considering the pain.
(The only good news is that any problem is likely to be *very*
obvious. Switching the field to a 32-bit type on a big-endian machine
and not catching some case will mean that people will check or modify
the wrong flags, and you'd likely get breakage quite quickly)
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists