[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1458084692-23100-88-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:31:21 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 87/98] tcp: fix tcpi_segs_in after connection establishment
4.2.8-ckt6 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
---8<------------------------------------------------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
commit a9d99ce28ed359d68cf6f3c1a69038aefedf6d6a upstream.
If final packet (ACK) of 3WHS is lost, it appears we do not properly
account the following incoming segment into tcpi_segs_in
While we are at it, starts segs_in with one, to count the SYN packet.
We do not yet count number of SYN we received for a request sock, we
might add this someday.
packetdrill script showing proper behavior after fix :
// Tests tcpi_segs_in when 3rd packet (ACK) of 3WHS is lost
0.000 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
+0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
+0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
+0 listen(3, 1) = 0
+0 < S 0:0(0) win 32792 <mss 1000,sackOK,nop,nop>
+0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK>
+.020 < P. 1:1001(1000) ack 1 win 32792
+0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
+.000 %{ assert tcpi_segs_in == 2, 'tcpi_segs_in=%d' % tcpi_segs_in }%
Fixes: 2efd055c53c06 ("tcp: add tcpi_segs_in and tcpi_segs_out to tcp_info")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
index 4bc00cb..0e974b0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
newtp->rcv_wup = newtp->copied_seq =
newtp->rcv_nxt = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
- newtp->segs_in = 0;
+ newtp->segs_in = 1;
newtp->snd_sml = newtp->snd_una =
newtp->snd_nxt = newtp->snd_up = treq->snt_isn + 1;
@@ -813,6 +813,7 @@ int tcp_child_process(struct sock *parent, struct sock *child,
int ret = 0;
int state = child->sk_state;
+ tcp_sk(child)->segs_in += max_t(u16, 1, skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs);
if (!sock_owned_by_user(child)) {
ret = tcp_rcv_state_process(child, skb, tcp_hdr(skb),
skb->len);
--
2.7.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists