[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1603151313510.9662@nippy.intranet>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:19:58 +1100 (AEDT)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
Sam Creasey <sammy@...my.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/22] ncr5380: Adopt uniform DMA setup convention
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > @@ -1555,8 +1555,7 @@ static int NCR5380_transfer_dma(struct S
> > NCR5380_read(RESET_PARITY_INTERRUPT_REG);
> > *data = d + c;
> > *count = 0;
> > - *phase = NCR5380_read(STATUS_REG) & PHASE_MASK;
> > - return foo;
> > + return result;
> > }
> >
> > /*
>
> Don't you miss a phase update here?
I guess I missed explaining the change in the commit log.
The *phase assignment is redundant because after NCR5380_transfer_dma()
returns control to NCR5380_information_transfer(), the latter routine then
also returns, and so *phase is dead.
--
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists