lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:06:40 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the aio tree with the vfs tree

Hi Ben,

Today's linux-next merge of the aio tree got a conflict in:

  fs/namei.c

between commit:

  5955102c9984 ("wrappers for ->i_mutex access")

from the vfs tree and commit:

  5d3d80fcf992 ("aio: add support for in-submit openat")

from the aio tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/namei.c
index 794f81dce766,260782f5a868..000000000000
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@@ -3125,9 -3079,15 +3125,15 @@@ retry_lookup
  		 * dropping this one anyway.
  		 */
  	}
+ 
+ 	if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_NONBLOCK) {
+ 		error = -EAGAIN;
+ 		goto out;
+ 	}
+ 		
 -	mutex_lock(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
 +	inode_lock(dir->d_inode);
  	error = lookup_open(nd, &path, file, op, got_write, opened);
 -	mutex_unlock(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
 +	inode_unlock(dir->d_inode);
  
  	if (error <= 0) {
  		if (error)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ