[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160316224634.GA3580@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:46:34 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@...scape.net>,
szegad <szegadlo@...zta.onet.pl>, prash <prash.n.rao@...il.com>,
amish <ammdispose-arch@...oo.com>,
Matthias <morpheusxyz123@...oo.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 774ac8b7eff6 ("Thermal: initialize thermal zone
device correctly") causes performance drop
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 03:27:57PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fedora received a bug report (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317190)
> of a major performance drop on various bench marks and general system
> sluggishness with the 4.4.4 kernel update. The benchmarks were showing
> a reduction to about 18% performance (not minor).
>
> Bisection showed the first bad commit was
>
> commit 774ac8b7eff69e0786970157de2157e68b22f456
> Author: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> Date: Fri Oct 30 16:31:47 2015 +0800
>
> Thermal: initialize thermal zone device correctly
> commit bb431ba26c5cd0a17c941ca6c3a195a3a6d5d461 upstream.
> After thermal zone device registered, as we have not read any
> temperature before, thus tz->temperature should not be 0,
> which actually means 0C, and thermal trend is not available.
> In this case, we need specially handling for the first
> thermal_zone_device_update().
> Both thermal core framework and step_wise governor is
> enhanced to handle this. And since the step_wise governor
> is the only one that uses trends, so it's the only thermal
> governor that needs to be updated.
> Tested-by: Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@...scape.net>
> Tested-by: szegad <szegadlo@...zta.onet.pl>
> Tested-by: prash <prash.n.rao@...il.com>
> Tested-by: amish <ammdispose-arch@...oo.com>
> Tested-by: Matthias <morpheusxyz123@...oo.de>
> Reviewed-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
>
>
> Reverting this plus to other commits in the series (a67208e94d94
> "Thermal: handle thermal zone device properly during system sleep"
> and 27f356149d59 "Thermal: do thermal zone update after a cooling
> device registered") confirmed the performance was back to normal.
>
> Bugzilla has the full discussion but this comment from one of the
> reporters sums it up:
>
> "In 4.4.3 and prior, my 2.40 MHz processor would fluctuate between
> 1000 and 3400 MHz. In 4.4.4, the processor would fluctuate between
> 400 and 700 MHz, according to /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> Setting /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_governor to
> performance, instead of the default "powersave" forces the CPU to
> 2400 MHz, and improves performance greatly, but still not to the
> same level as in 4.4.3."
>
> Any ideas?
Is this same "slowdown" also seen in 4.5?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists