[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E93C43.1060500@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:58:11 +0100
From: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To: Julien Chauveau <chauveau.julien@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add power key to GeekBox
Am 11.03.2016 um 00:04 schrieb Julien Chauveau:
>> Le 6 mars 2016 à 20:53, Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> a écrit :
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
>> ---
>> v2 -> v3:
>> * Adopted wakeup-source instead of gpio-key,wakeup (Julien)
>> * Dropped gpio-keys #address-cells and #size-cells properties (Julien)
>> * Dropped power button reg property (Julien)
>> * Adopted KEY_POWER (Julien)
>> * Fixed power button pinctrl pull setting (Julien)
>>
>> v2: New
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368-geekbox.dts | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368-geekbox.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368-geekbox.dts
>> index 098be3700a6f..7036b49c9206 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368-geekbox.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3368-geekbox.dts
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>>
>> /dts-v1/;
>> #include "rk3368.dtsi"
>> +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
>>
>> / {
>> model = "GeekBox";
>> @@ -70,6 +71,19 @@
>> pinctrl-0 = <&ir_int>;
>> };
>>
>> + keys: gpio-keys {
>
> I think you don't need the "keys" label, because there’s no phandle that refers to this.
As discussed elsewhere, there are four additional keys on the
Landingship (you proposed as sub-node names key1-key4).
I prefer preparing the label now over adding it in a later patch.
>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pwr_key>;
>> +
>> + button@0 {
>
> Here you should use "power" instead of "button@0".
Done.
>> + gpios = <&gpio0 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + label = "GPIO Power";
>> + linux,code = <KEY_POWER>;
>
> According to Documentation/input/event-codes.txt, there’s a special event type for the power button.
> Should we use it here for that purpose?
>
> linux,input-type = <EV_PWR>
The other RK3368 boards don't, so unless you can give a justification to
convert all boards yet again and test how this makes a difference, I'd
rather not do experiments here but leave that to someone who knows what
they're doing and then do it consistently...
Thanks for the detailed review,
Andreas
>> + wakeup-source;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> leds: gpio-leds {
>> compatible = "gpio-leds";
>>
>> @@ -265,6 +279,12 @@
>> };
>> };
>>
>> + keys {
>> + pwr_key: pwr-key {
>> + rockchip,pins = <0 2 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> pmic {
>> pmic_sleep: pmic-sleep {
>> rockchip,pins = <0 0 RK_FUNC_2 &pcfg_pull_none>;
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists