linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160315.225709.1732687324535302348.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:57:09 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	robert.jarzmik@...e.fr
Cc:	festevam@...il.com, g.liakhovetski@....de,
	mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp, fabio.estevam@...escale.com,
	mitake.hitoshi@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: smc911x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine

From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:56:58 +0100

> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> writes:
> 
>> Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> writes:
>>> Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
>>
>> Thanks Fabio for the test.
>>
>> I also tried with a different different approach.
>>
>> I built the different platforms (imx v6, etc ...) :
>>  - one version (a) on a vanilla v4.5-rc2
>>  - one version (b) on a vaniall v4.5-rc2 + this patch
>>
>> For each of the builds, I took the preprocessed output of smc911x.c, and made a
>> diff between (a) and (b). The commands used were :
>>  - building in [1]
>>  - diffing in [2]
>>
>> The result is [3]. I conclude from [3] that the driver cannot break for non PXA
>> platforms.
>>
>> With Fabio's test and this demonstration, is enough to convince you to apply
>> this patch David ?
> Hi David,
> 
> Can you consider this patch now it is tested please ?

Please resubmit the patch fresh with the appropriate Tested-by: tags
added, thanks.