[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E944D1.9000907@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:34:41 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>,
Petr Kulhavy <petr@...ix.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: davinci: da8xx: add cfgchip2 to resources
Hello.
On 3/16/2016 6:46 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>> No, this register is shared b/w MUSB and OHCI. The proper thing to
>> do is to write the PHY driver and let it control this shared register.
> OK. I've started working on this. I am looking at using struct usb_phy,
> however, enum usb_phy_type only has USB_PHY_TYPE_UNDEFINED, USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2,
> and USB_PHY_TYPE_USB3. Would it be acceptable to use USB_PHY_TYPE_UNDEFINED
> for the ohci since it is USB 1.1? Or perhaps I should use the more generic
> struct phy for that one?
No new USB PHY drivers accepted, look at drivers/phy/ instead please.
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists