linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: don't allow irq_fpu_usable when the VCPU's XCR0 is loaded

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56E94B08.9030705@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:01:12 +0100
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: don't allow irq_fpu_usable when the VCPU's XCR0
 is loaded



On 16/03/2016 04:55, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Probably not. AFAICT KVM does not rely on it being loaded outside that
>>>>> region. xsetbv isn't insanely expensive, is it? Maybe to minimize the
>>>>> time spent with interrupts disabled it was put outside.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do like that your solution would be contained to KVM.
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Andy.  We do want a fix for recent kernels because of the
>>>> !eager_fpu case that Guangrong mentioned.
> 
> Relying on interrupt is not easy as XCR0 can not be automatically
> saved/loaded by VMCS... Once interrupt happens, it will use guest's XCR0 anyway.

Right, that's why an xsetbv while interrupts are disabled is appealing.

Paolo