[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ijjunydksVHHwttKzi798nXA2grypZ3oXoJEqqDsYR2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:30:56 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: acpi: Allow new dynamics attributes to be added
to acpi_cpufreq_attr
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 09-03-16, 14:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > On 03-03-16, 18:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> Srinivas, can you please take this and rebase your patch on top of it?
>> >> Or if you prefer, I can take it into my linux-next branch.
>> >
>> > Right, so you need to apply this patch as Srinivas already sent a separate patch
>> > for his stuff, rebased over this.
>>
>> I know, but I'm deferring that one as we aren't entirely sure about
>> the approach yet.
>
> I might have missed, but what are we not sure about here ? I thought, all three
> of us agreed that this is a good idea ..
We are not sure if the new attribute is needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists