| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACVXFVMs-fOaNVUyedg66T83MiOc7a+op3LeHVt6ogVBQnYdeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 23:40:02 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] block: fix bio merge checks when virt_boundary is set
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hyper-V storage driver, which switched to using virt_boundary some time
> ago, experiences significant slowdown on non-page-aligned IO. E.g.
>
> With virt_boundary set:
> # time mkfs.ntfs -Q -s 512 /dev/sdc1
> ...
> real 0m9.406s
> user 0m0.014s
> sys 0m0.672s
>
> Without virt_boundary set (unsafe):
> # time mkfs.ntfs -Q -s 512 /dev/sdc1
> ...
> real 0m6.657s
> user 0m0.012s
> sys 0m6.423s
>
> The reason of the slowdown is the fact that bios don't get merged and we
> end up sending many short requests to the host. My investigation led me to
> the following code (__bvec_gap_to_prev()):
>
> return offset ||
> ((bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len) & queue_virt_boundary(q));
>
> Here is an example: we have two bio_vec with the following content:
> bprv.bv_offset = 512
> bprv.bv_len = 512
>
> bnxt.bv_offset = 1024
> bnxt.bv_len = 512
>
> bprv.bv_page == bnxt.bv_page
> virt_boundary is set to PAGE_SIZE-1
>
> The above mentioned code will report that a gap will appear if we merge
> these two (as offset = 1024) but this doesn't look sane. On top of that,
> we have the following optimization in bio_add_pc_page():
>
> if (page == prev->bv_page &&
> offset == prev->bv_offset + prev->bv_len) {
> prev->bv_len += len;
> bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
> goto done;
> }
>
> But we don't have such check in other places, which check virt_boundary.
We do have the above merge in bio_add_page(), so the two bios in
your above example shouldn't have been observed if the two buffers
are added to bio via the bio_add_page().
If you see short bios in above example, maybe you need to check ntfs code:
- if bio_add_page() is used to add buffer
- if using one standalone bio to transfer each 512byte, even they
are in same page and the sector is continuous
> Modify the check in __bvec_gap_to_prev() to the following:
> 1) Report no gap in case bnxt->bv_offset == bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len
> when bprv.bv_page == bnxt.bv_page.
> 2) Continue reporting no gap in (bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len) &
> queue_virt_boundary(q) case.
>
> Reported-by: John R. Kozee II <jkozee@...ser-morner.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> ---
> - The condition I'm changing was there since SG_GAPS so I may be missing
> something important, thus RFC.
> ---
> block/bio-integrity.c | 7 +++++--
> block/bio.c | 4 +++-
> block/blk-merge.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 17 +++++++++--------
> 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bio-integrity.c b/block/bio-integrity.c
> index 711e4d8d..f8560da 100644
> --- a/block/bio-integrity.c
> +++ b/block/bio-integrity.c
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ int bio_integrity_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
> unsigned int len, unsigned int offset)
> {
> struct bio_integrity_payload *bip = bio_integrity(bio);
> - struct bio_vec *iv;
> + struct bio_vec *iv, bv;
>
> if (bip->bip_vcnt >= bip->bip_max_vcnt) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bip_vec full\n", __func__);
> @@ -144,10 +144,13 @@ int bio_integrity_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
> }
>
> iv = bip->bip_vec + bip->bip_vcnt;
> + bv.bv_page = page;
> + bv.bv_len = len;
> + bv.bv_offset = offset;
>
> if (bip->bip_vcnt &&
> bvec_gap_to_prev(bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev),
> - &bip->bip_vec[bip->bip_vcnt - 1], offset))
> + &bip->bip_vec[bip->bip_vcnt - 1], &bv))
> return 0;
>
> iv->bv_page = page;
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index cf75915..1583581 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -730,6 +730,8 @@ int bio_add_pc_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
> */
> if (bio->bi_vcnt > 0) {
> struct bio_vec *prev = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1];
> + struct bio_vec bv = {.bv_page = page, .bv_len = len,
> + .bv_offset = offset};
>
> if (page == prev->bv_page &&
> offset == prev->bv_offset + prev->bv_len) {
> @@ -742,7 +744,7 @@ int bio_add_pc_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
> * If the queue doesn't support SG gaps and adding this
> * offset would create a gap, disallow it.
> */
> - if (bvec_gap_to_prev(q, prev, offset))
> + if (bvec_gap_to_prev(q, prev, &bv))
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 2613531..8c6c3e2 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
> * If the queue doesn't support SG gaps and adding this
> * offset would create a gap, disallow it.
> */
> - if (bvprvp && bvec_gap_to_prev(q, bvprvp, bv.bv_offset))
> + if (bvprvp && bvec_gap_to_prev(q, bvprvp, &bv))
> goto split;
>
> if (sectors + (bv.bv_len >> 9) > max_sectors) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 413c84f..b4fa29d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -1373,10 +1373,11 @@ static inline void put_dev_sector(Sector p)
> }
>
> static inline bool __bvec_gap_to_prev(struct request_queue *q,
> - struct bio_vec *bprv, unsigned int offset)
> + struct bio_vec *bprv, struct bio_vec *bnxt)
> {
> - return offset ||
> - ((bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len) & queue_virt_boundary(q));
> + if (bprv->bv_page == bnxt->bv_page)
> + return bnxt->bv_offset != bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len;
> + return (bprv->bv_offset + bprv->bv_len) & queue_virt_boundary(q);
Why do you remove check on 'offset'?
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1384,11 +1385,11 @@ static inline bool __bvec_gap_to_prev(struct request_queue *q,
> * the SG list. Most drivers don't care about this, but some do.
> */
> static inline bool bvec_gap_to_prev(struct request_queue *q,
> - struct bio_vec *bprv, unsigned int offset)
> + struct bio_vec *bprv, struct bio_vec *bnxt)
> {
> if (!queue_virt_boundary(q))
> return false;
> - return __bvec_gap_to_prev(q, bprv, offset);
> + return __bvec_gap_to_prev(q, bprv, bnxt);
> }
>
> static inline bool bio_will_gap(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *prev,
> @@ -1400,7 +1401,7 @@ static inline bool bio_will_gap(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *prev,
> bio_get_last_bvec(prev, &pb);
> bio_get_first_bvec(next, &nb);
>
> - return __bvec_gap_to_prev(q, &pb, nb.bv_offset);
> + return __bvec_gap_to_prev(q, &pb, &nb);
> }
>
> return false;
> @@ -1545,7 +1546,7 @@ static inline bool integrity_req_gap_back_merge(struct request *req,
> struct bio_integrity_payload *bip_next = bio_integrity(next);
>
> return bvec_gap_to_prev(req->q, &bip->bip_vec[bip->bip_vcnt - 1],
> - bip_next->bip_vec[0].bv_offset);
> + &bip_next->bip_vec[0]);
> }
>
> static inline bool integrity_req_gap_front_merge(struct request *req,
> @@ -1555,7 +1556,7 @@ static inline bool integrity_req_gap_front_merge(struct request *req,
> struct bio_integrity_payload *bip_next = bio_integrity(req->bio);
>
> return bvec_gap_to_prev(req->q, &bip->bip_vec[bip->bip_vcnt - 1],
> - bip_next->bip_vec[0].bv_offset);
> + &bip_next->bip_vec[0]);
> }
>
> #else /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY */
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Ming Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists