linux-kernel - Re: [RFT] iommu/amd: use subsys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160316161736.GL1990@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:17:37 +0100
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:	Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>
Cc:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT] iommu/amd: use subsys_initcall() on amdv2 iommu

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:16:57PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:02:43AM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> >> fwiw, we currently have this covered by the ugly hack of putting iommu
> >> subsystem in front of gpu subsystem in the main drivers makefile (See
> >> 1bacc894c227fad8a727eb99728df708eba57654)
> >
> > Sure, but the above is a less ugly hack to solve the problem. So the
> > question is, would that work too?
> >
> >
> >         Joerg
> >
> 
> In theory it should, but I would prefer that it would be tested on
> actual hardware.

Hence, RFT. Anyone have hardware to test ? And would the other hack
mentioned need to be reverted first ?

  Luis