linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] net: macb: Checkpatch cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAtXAHdxen+h+i6BPMp3kqGd-wjaV3YHDrdPP-4u2QciQREFww@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:30:16 -0700
From:	Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>, joe@...ches.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	moritz.fischer.private@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] net: macb: Checkpatch cleanups

Nicolas,

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> wrote:
> Le 13/03/2016 20:10, Moritz Fischer a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I backed out the variable scope changes and made a separate
>> patch for the ether_addr_copy change.
>>
>> Changes from v1:
>
> As it's v2, it's better to add it in each subject of the patch series like:
> "[PATCH v2 0/5] net: macb: Checkpatch cleanups"

Yeah, I fat-fingered that.  Figured it is less annoying than resending
the series immediately.
Do you want me to resend the series as v3 with Acked-bys and fixed patch 5?
Through which tree will this go?

Merci,

Moritz