[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E8D720.7000508@lechnology.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:46:40 -0500
From: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>,
Petr Kulhavy <petr@...ix.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: davinci: da8xx: add cfgchip2 to resources
On 03/15/2016 05:45 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>
> No, this register is shared b/w MUSB and OHCI. The proper thing to
> do is to write the PHY driver and let it control this shared register.
>
OK. I've started working on this. I am looking at using struct usb_phy,
however, enum usb_phy_type only has USB_PHY_TYPE_UNDEFINED,
USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2, and USB_PHY_TYPE_USB3. Would it be acceptable to use
USB_PHY_TYPE_UNDEFINED for the ohci since it is USB 1.1? Or perhaps I
should use the more generic struct phy for that one?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists