linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: add driver for Microchip MCP414X/416X/424X/426X

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:24:59 +0100
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Slawomir Stepien <sst@...zta.fm>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>
Cc:	jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: add driver for Microchip MCP414X/416X/424X/426X

On 03/16/2016 05:25 PM, Slawomir Stepien wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2016 13:30, Peter Meerwald-Stadler wrote:
[...]
>> plenty of the private API, some of which seems to be debug only?
>> what is really needed to interact with a poti?
> 
> I wanted to export both the non volatile and volatile memory addresses for wiper
> position access. That is bare minimum for the poti to operate.
> 
> But I also wanted to export additional features of this chip. That is way there
> is increase and decrease API, and STATUS and TCON register access.
> 

The important part about a framework and the associated device drivers
is to expose the features of a device using a standardized interface so
you can write generic applications/libraries and share infrastructure.
If an application requires device specific knowledge to access the
features of a device you may as well write a userspace driver using i2cdev.

So when you are introducing new ABI it should at least follow the
standard naming scheme. And also try to think whether this is a feature
that is present in other similar devices and come up with a device
independent way to expose this functionality.

Let's start with the simple stuff, I don't really see the advantage of
having separate inc/dec controls. This can be handled through the
standard raw attribute. If the newly written value is one off from the
previous one use inc/dec otherwise write it directly. And even then it
might make sense to just ignore that and always write the raw value.

> The memory_map API is a way to access all the not used by chip memory addresses.
> This API I think could be deleted. But I still think that some people might find
> it useful.

This sounds more like it should maybe be exposed as a standard EEPROM
device.