lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160317104136.GC3100@mwanda>
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:41:36 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@....org>
Cc:	dev@...nvswitch.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] openvswitch: using a bit shift as a mask

The original condition is never true.  We want to test if BIT(0) is set
but the code is ANDing with zero.

Fixes: 05752523e565 ('openvswitch: Interface with NAT.')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
index dc5eb29..29c82d6 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ static int ovs_ct_nat(struct net *net, struct sw_flow_key *key,
 	 */
 	if (info->nat & OVS_CT_NAT && ctinfo != IP_CT_NEW &&
 	    ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK &&
-	    (!(ct->status & IPS_EXPECTED_BIT) || info->commit)) {
+	    (!(ct->status & IPS_EXPECTED) || info->commit)) {
 		/* NAT an established or related connection like before. */
 		if (CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo) == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
 			/* This is the REPLY direction for a connection

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ