[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50399556C9727B4D88A595C8584AAB37B4E504AA@GSjpTKYDCembx32.service.hitachi.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:58:20 +0000
From: 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: "'ltc-kernel@...yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp'"
<ltc-kernel@...yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp>,
"'David Long'" <dave.long@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
John Blackwood <john.blackwood@...r.com>,
Feng Kan <fkan@....com>, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
Vladimir Murzin <Vladimir.Murzin@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@....com>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Balamurugan Shanmugam <bshanmugam@....com>,
sysp-manager <cti.systems-productivity-manager.ts@...achi.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 8/9] arm64: Add kernel return probes support
(kretprobes)
>From: 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI [mailto:masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com]
>
>Hi,
>
>>From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>
>>
>>The pre-handler of this special 'trampoline' kprobe executes the return
>>probe handler functions and restores original return address in ELR_EL1.
>>This way the saved pt_regs still hold the original register context to be
>>carried back to the probed kernel function.
>
>This patch seems not well separated.
>
>>diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>>index bd3f233..13d3333 100644
>>--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>>+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>
>[snip]
>
>>+void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
>>+ struct pt_regs *regs)
>>+{
>>+ ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->regs[30];
>>+
>>+ /* replace return addr (x30) with trampoline */
>>+ regs->regs[30] = (long)&kretprobe_trampoline;
>
>So, where is the kretprobe_trampoline? It seems that function is
>defined in other patch.
>
>>+}
>>+
>>+int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>>+{
>>+ return 0;
>> }
>
>And what this function is for??
Ah, sorry, this was my fault. Yes, this function is required.
But this implementation also means there is an asm-based trampoline
function which should be included in this patch.
David, could you tell me the repository which I can get the latest
version of this series? I'd like to see the whole code of kprobes/arm64.
Thank you,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists